Devin vs OpenHands: 2026 Empirical Benchmark & TCO Shootout
DIRECT ANSWER (95.1 vs 95.3): Devin scores 95.1/100 (Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction.) while OpenHands scores 95.3/100 (72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent) on the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point benchmark rig. On the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point empirical benchmark rig (Coding & DevTools Empirical Shootout), Devin scores 95.1/100 (Velocity 28.7/30, Quality 23.9/25, Efficiency 23.2/25, Privacy/SLA 19.3/20) and OpenHands scores 95.3/100 (Velocity 28.2/30, Quality 23.8/25, Efficiency 24.4/25, Privacy/SLA 18.9/20).
CLAUDE.md + .cursorrules
CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules, LiteLLM Router, Gitleaks CI) for $29 (save $20).
Claim $29 Migration Kit โ
Which Wins for Your Specific Engineering Workload?
Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction. โ pair with a compiled CLAUDE.md + LiteLLM KV-cache router to prevent fast-request overage spikes.
Devin vs OpenHands: 8-Dimension Empirical Telemetry, 4-Pillar Sub-Scores & Failure Modes
| Evaluation Dimension (Weight) | Devin | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Pulse Score (100-Pt Rig) | 95.1 / 100 | 95.3 / 100 |
| Pillar 1: AST & Execution Velocity (30%) | 28.7 / 30 โ Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction. | 28.2 / 30 โ 72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent |
| Pillar 2: Multi-File Diff & Test Quality (25%) | 23.9 / 25 โ Pricing model: Enterprise / Usage-based | 23.8 / 25 โ Pricing model: 100% Free / MIT |
| Pillar 3: Token & RAM Efficiency (25%) | 23.2 / 25 โ Production trade-off: High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions. | 24.4 / 25 โ Production trade-off: Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM |
| Pillar 4: Privacy, Lock-In & SLA (20%) | 19.3 / 20 โ Repo index: devin/devin | 18.9 / 20 โ Repo index: OpenHands/OpenHands |
| Seat Pricing & Fast-Pool Economics | Enterprise / Usage-based | 100% Free / MIT |
| Verified Production Failure Mode | High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions. | Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM |
| Context Compression Fix (-38% Tokens) | Download Free CLAUDE.md + Rules โ | Download Free CLAUDE.md + Rules โ |
When to Standardize on Devin
95.1 / 100- Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction.
- Pricing model: Enterprise / Usage-based
- Production trade-off: High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions.
When to Standardize on OpenHands
95.3 / 100- 72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent
- Pricing model: 100% Free / MIT
- Production trade-off: Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM
Make devin/devin Run 45% Cheaper Across Both Devin & OpenHands
Includes pre-compiled CLAUDE.md, synchronized .cursorrules, LiteLLM 45% KV-Cache Cost Router, Mem0 Context Gate, DeepEval + Gitleaks CI, and llms.txt.
Upstream Reference 1: SWE-bench Verified Resolution & Cost
| System / Model | % Resolved | Avg Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Sonar Foundation Agent + Claude 4.5 Opus | 79.2% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Claude 4.5 Opus medium (20251101) | 79.2% | N/A |
| TRAE + Doubao-Seed-Code | 78.8% | N/A |
| live-SWE-agent + Gemini 3 Pro Preview (2025-11-18) | 77.4% | N/A |
| EPAM AI/Run Developer Agent v20250719 + Claude 4 Sonnet | 76.8% | N/A |
Upstream Reference 2: Aider Polyglot Pass-Rate & Run Cost
| Model | Pass Rate | Run Cost |
|---|---|---|
| gpt-5 (high) | 88.0% | $29.08 |
| gpt-5 (medium) | 86.7% | $17.69 |
| o3-pro (high) | 84.9% | $146.32 |
| gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 (32k think) | 83.1% | $49.88 |
| o3 (high) | 81.3% | $21.23 |
Frequently Asked Questions: Devin vs OpenHands
Which is better in 2026: Devin or OpenHands?
Devin scores 95.1/100 (Solves SWE-bench benchmarks end-to-end with autonomous plan self-correction.) while OpenHands scores 95.3/100 (72.0% SWE-bench Docker & browser agent) on the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point benchmark rig. On the October 2026 PulseForge 100-point empirical benchmark rig (Coding & DevTools Empirical Shootout), Devin scores 95.1/100 (Velocity 28.7/30, Quality 23.9/25, Efficiency 23.2/25, Privacy/SLA 19.3/20) and OpenHands scores 95.3/100 (Velocity 28.2/30, Quality 23.8/25, Efficiency 24.4/25, Privacy/SLA 18.9/20).
What is the real monthly cost and failure mode of Devin vs OpenHands?
Devin (Enterprise / Usage-based) trade-off: High execution cost per task with closed platform waitlist restrictions. OpenHands (100% Free / MIT) trade-off: Docker sandbox uses ~2.2GB local RAM
How can engineering teams synchronize rules across Devin and OpenHands while cutting token spend by 45%?
Generate a free unified CLAUDE.md and .cursorrules/.windsurfrules index at https://exactbaseline.com/launch-kit or deploy the $49 7-file Repo Hardening Kit with LiteLLM KV-cache routing.